[as2api-dev] Problems processing undocumented types

[David Holroyd]

On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 04:30:44PM -0500, Brandon Goldsworthy wrote:
> David Holroyd wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:06:02PM -0500, Brandon Goldsworthy wrote:
> >>Using a command like the following to generate documentation for 
> >>com.package1.* classes which are defined in the ProjectName1\src path, I 
> >>do indeed get stuff inherited from MovieClip (and, I expect, all the base 
> >>types in ...\Classes\FP7\), but I don't get stuff inherited from mx.* 
> >>classes or from the com.package2.* classes which are defined in the 
> >>ProjectName2\src path.
> >>
> >>ruby as2api.rb --classpath "C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local 
> >>Settings\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash 
> >>8\en\Configuration\Classes\FP7;C:\Documents and Settings\username\Local 
> >>Settings\Application Data\Macromedia\Flash 
> >>8\en\Configuration\Classes;C:\projects\ProjectName2\src;C:\projects\ProjectName1\src" 
> >>--output-dir "c:\projects\AS_Common\apidoc" com.package1.*
> >>
> >>
> >>If I add mx.* and com.package2.* to the package list, I get everything as 
> >>expected, so as2api can see and read the classes properly. But I don't 
> >>want all those classes cluttering up the index/package panes.
> >
> >That sounds like it should work.  Do you see any error or warning
> >messages being produced?

> I'm getting "warning: package '***' will not be documented." for each of 
> the mx.* and com.package2.* classes at the beginning.
> 
> For later references I'm getting "... Couldn't resolve import of '***'" 
> and/or "... Found no definition of type known locally as '***'".
> 
> 
> If this doesn't indicate a known/common problem, let me know and I'll try 
> to whittle it down to a minimal example of a handful of packages/files so I 
> don't have to send you my entire source tree, which is pretty large at this 
> point.

Maybe you could just send the entire list of messages from the
invocation that doesn't work, and the invocation that includes the
dependant packages into the documented set?


ta,
dave

-- 
http://david.holroyd.me.uk/