[metaas-dev] No viable alternative error

[kiroukou]

Last error I have :
run:
line 1:0 no viable alternative at character 'Ô'
line 1:1 no viable alternative at character 'ª'
line 1:2 no viable alternative at character 'ø'
line 1:0 no viable alternative at character 'Ô'
line 1:1 no viable alternative at character 'ª'
line 1:2 no viable alternative at character 'ø'
line 1:0 no viable alternative at character 'Ô'
line 1:1 no viable alternative at character 'ª'
line 1:2 no viable alternative at character 'ø'
line 1:0 no viable alternative at character 'Ô'
line 1:1 no viable alternative at character 'ª'
line 1:2 no viable alternative at character 'ø'
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:  
expected IDENTIFIER, but token was a STAR
         at uk.co.badgersinfoil.metaas.impl.ASTUtils.identText 
(ASTUtils.java:67)
         at uk.co.badgersinfoil.metaas.impl.ASTASArg.getType 
(ASTASArg.java:37)



Isn't the Start type supported?

Thomas



Le 18 févr. 07 à 22:32, David Holroyd a écrit :

> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:45:31PM +0000, David Holroyd wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 09:18:49PM +0100, kiroukou wrote:
>>> line 1:0 no viable alternative at character '?'
>>> line 1:1 no viable alternative at character '?'
>>> line 1:2 no viable alternative at character '?'
>>> line 1:0 no viable alternative at character '?'
>>> line 1:1 no viable alternative at character '?'
>>> line 1:2 no viable alternative at character '?'
>
>> I'd still be interested to know where the 'no viable alt' messages  
>> are
>> coming from though.  Given that they are all reported at 'line 1', I
>> imagine this is actually a message about the code you are generating,
>> rather than the code you are parsing.  I suspect that the error
>> reporting in some part of the lexical analysis needs to be  
>> tightened up.
>>
>> Were the reported characters question marks ('?') at your end, or are
>> these actually non-ascii characters that are getting mangled by my  
>> mail
>> client?
>
> Ok, using a different mail client, I now see that these are indeed  
> just
> non-ascii characters.
>
> Is this intended?  i.e. if i extend the ActionScript lexer to allow
> additional characters to appear in identifier names (for instance) is
> that going to help you?
>
>
> thanks!
> dave
>
> -- 
> http://david.holroyd.me.uk/
>
> _______________________________________________
> metaas-dev mailing list
> metaas-dev at lists.badgers-in-foil.co.uk
> http://lists.badgers-in-foil.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/metaas-dev